Newsletter Signup

Open Letter to Minister From Burlington Mayor on Halton Regional Council LPAT Resolution


On Friday, July 12, I sent an open letter to the Honourable Steve Clark, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in response to a Toronto Star article posted on July 10 regarding the resolution Halton Regional Council passed on that same day, asking the Province of Ontario to eliminate the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT).

A copy of the resolution passed at Halton Regional Council is available here: LPAT Resolution Halton Regional Council July 10.

Please see the Open Letter to Honourable Minister Steve Clark below:

Dear Minister Clark,

On July 10th, Halton Region Council unanimously passed a motion to eliminate the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). I am attaching a copy of the resolution for your information.

I noted your recent comments to the Toronto Star and wanted to respond to some of the points you mentioned. I will share this letter with my constituents in an effort to keep them informed as well, especially given the high degree of interest in this topic.

My municipal colleagues in Halton and I are united in our desire to eliminate the LPAT. Ontario is the only province with an unelected body governing local planning decisions. Communities are successfully built across our country without this additional layer of bureaucracy and we believe it’s time Ontario’s cities are similarly empowered with the same abilities and autonomy that exist throughout the rest of Canada.

Furthermore, the costs and delays involved in the appeals process run in stark opposition to the very goals your provincial government has said it is trying to achieve: saving money and getting more housing to market, cheaper and faster. The LPAT achieves neither.

The backlog of cases that you referenced in your email to media this week was created during the transition to the LPAT because developers knew the former Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) rules were more favourable to them. As a result, many filed “preemptive” appeals as soon as they could. This was done not based on any decision by a council, but because they simply wanted to “preserve” their rights under the old OMB rules. They wanted to be grandfathered in — and they were.

Now, we’re headed back to the OMB rules as a result of Bill 108, and towards what we believe will be even longer hearings and more delays.

The LPAT didn’t create the backlog and reverting to the old OMB rules won’t solve the problem; it will make it worse. The backlog is the direct result of what we’ve been saying all along: the OMB is weighted against local decision-making and toward an “anything goes” approach. That’s why the developers have clogged the system with appeals under the old rules.

To provide a specific example, we can look the development proposed for 92 Plains Road East in Burlington. The developer’s appeal was made in April of 2018. The appellant made an offer to settle the appeal in March 2019, with the offer being accepted in April 2019. A settlement hearing is scheduled for September 2019 at which time the Tribunal will decide on the appeal. If the appellant had not appealed and simply continued in the application consideration process, the amendments to the development could have been made much earlier, and Council consideration and a decision would have been reached in 2018.

The irony of this situation is that if the OMB had not existed, and the developers hadn’t preemptively applied during the transition to LPAT to preserve rights to an OMB hearing, they would already have had their housing approval, shovels would be in the ground, and we would all be saving time and money.

This system is not serving anyone. Our communities’ voices are being overridden and valuable time and money is being wasted that could be better spent on front-line services and the priorities city councils have been democratically elected to implement for the citizens who elected us.

We need to eliminate the LPAT and join the rest of Canada in empowering our local governments to make the best decisions about how their cities continue to grow and evolve. I am asking you to work with your government to eliminate the LPAT, a costly, time-consuming, undemocratic body that delays the delivery of housing.


Mayor Marianne Meed Ward

City of Burlington


Receive new post notifications by email

4 thoughts on “Open Letter to Minister From Burlington Mayor on Halton Regional Council LPAT Resolution”

  1. Elizabeth Goodchild

    I am in total agreement with Mayor Meed Ward’s letter to eliminate the LPAT. It is nice to know that Mayor Meed Ward listens and is aware of everything that goes on in the community. I thank the Mayor for sending this letter and hope that we all get the results that will truly help our community.

  2. Thank you for this and all previous communications in an attempt to shut down the OMB/LPAT. Hopefully the Minister will now pay attention to what the people and regions are recommending, for the benefit of all, and also saving the taxpayers’ money currently expended for this antiquated governing body.

  3. I am in total agreement with Mayor Meed Ward’s reasons for advocating the elimination of the LPAC. Thank you Marianne and other local Mayors for fighting this.!

What's your take?

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Constituent Assistant: Hannelie van Niekerk
905-335-7600, ext. 7689