Newsletter Signup

Comment by June 4: Improvements made to Aldershot GO mobility hub, but more needed to protect established neighbourhoods, prevent overintensification

aldershot - mid-rise residential 2

Staff recently presented revised plans for the Aldershot GO mobility hub at a series of open houses. Changes include elimination of mid-rise up to 11 storys from Queen Mary (light yellow area), and reducing heights on Clearview from 19+ storeys to 11 (golden yellow area). In addition, heights have been increased up to 30 storeys for the Aldershot Go Central precinct area (dark purple area) at Waterdown and Masonry Court (Northwest corner is King Paving). Feedback can be provided to staff up to June 4 at Council is expected to discuss the three hubs at a workshop in July, with approval of the plans in early 2019. The new Official Plan will be amended to incorporate these plans. To learn more about the mobility hubs visit: Aldershot Go Mobility Hub

My Take: The changes are an improvement but still represent inappropriate development in a single family neighbourhood. The 11 storey permission should be removed from Clearview to retain the low density plan for this established neighbourhood. The principle of protecting established neighbourhoods near mobility hubs from intensification is already happening with White Oaks, St. Matthews, Queen Mary, and Glenwood School Drive around the Burlington GO hub. Clearview deserves the same protection. The 30 storey height is excessive and may create sunshadowing on the Clearview and adjacent community, as well as significant traffic onto Waterdown/Plains.

Receive new post notifications by email

5 thoughts on “Comment by June 4: Improvements made to Aldershot GO mobility hub, but more needed to protect established neighbourhoods, prevent overintensification”

  1. Perhaps the city should stop trying to cram more people into aldershot before they do something about the insane amount of traffic along Fairview/Plains road and the complete lack of functioning, synchronized traffic lights

  2. No way should we have 11 storey buildings in Clearview and Queen Mary area. already established single homes should not be taken away. can see small starter homes, semi-detached and freehold townhouses with garages and driveways but nothing more.

  3. I think we have too many apartments and not enough small single family homes for families with children. And right next to a railway track is absurd.

  4. Can we just stop with this “mobility hub” BS As long as we live in this city, especially South of the CDL, nothing will ever change.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.
Marianne Meed Ward

Marianne Meed Ward

A Better Burlington began in 2006 after my neighbours said they felt left out of city decisions, learning about them only after they’d been made. As journalist for 22 years, I thought “I can do something about that” and a website and newsletter were born. They’ve taken various forms and names over the years, but the intent remains: To let you know what’s happening at City Hall before decisions are made, so you can influence outcomes for A Better Burlington. The best decisions are made when elected representatives tap the wisdom of our community members, and welcome many different perspectives.This site allows residents to comment and debate with each other; our Commenting Guidelines established in 2016 aim to keep debate respectful. Got an idea or comment you want to share privately? Please, get in touch:

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Media Specialist: John Bkila