Newsletter Signup

Mayor’s Monday Mailbag – July 12, 2021 – Are there lessons from Glen Abbey for the proposed development of Millcroft Greens golf course?

STOCK_Mayors Mailbag Graphic_cropped

Welcome to the Mayor’s Monday Mailbag, an initiative Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed Ward and the Mayor’s Office has launched to share weekly answers to questions from the public we’ve received through our main email inbox at or the Mayor’s social media platforms.

At the end of the month, we’ll publish a roundup of those most pressing questions we’ve received in the weeks prior.

Mayor’s Monday Mailbag – July 12, 2021


“Hearing news about Oakville’s Glen Abbey Golf Course being saved by the Ministry stepping in. Can the Ministry, our MPPs, Region and City work together with the applicant to bring a similar conclusion to protect the Millcroft Golf Course from proposed development?”


We were all delighted by the news of the Province stepping up to protect Glen Abbey, and the decision on July 9 by Clublink to withdraw their appeals to the Ontario Lands Tribunal and continue operating as a golf course.

All of Regional Council, which includes all seven members of Burlington City Council, supported protecting this greenspace and seeking the Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO). We are grateful for the advocacy of local MPPs in this matter, and for Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing the Hon. Steve Clark’s actions in response to community input.

The Glen Abbey application was further along than the one for Millcroft in Burlington, and it had already completed the planning review and a vote by Oakville Council.

Our planning review in Burlington for Millcroft is still underway. To date, we have not received any indication that our review can be set aside midstream, prior to a recommendation and vote by council, and replaced with consideration of other options. So, for now, the review is continuing to reach those steps.

The review will culminate in a recommendation from staff, that could include refusal, approval, or approval with conditions, and a vote by council, that could be to accept or reject the staff recommendation, or modify it.

That recommendation and vote is expected by September/October 2021.

Those steps still remain. So, for now, until we hear otherwise, these are the expected next steps and timelines on the Millcroft file. If anything changes, we will be sure to let the public know.

It is helpful to know about all the options available to city and regional council, such as an MZO, and the Minister’s willingness to use this tool — if needed — based on advocacy from local communities and fellow MPPs. We are grateful for the interest they have shown on this file, and the value they place on greenspace. Certainly, the Province’s actions are indicative of the importance they place on greenspace, and that must factor into any decision-making on any greenspace.

Please rest assured that all of Burlington Council is deeply committed to ensuring the best decision is made on the Millcroft file, especially given the significant impacts on greenspace, with a view to ensuring the best outcome in conversation with our residents, planning staff and the applicant.

There is more to come, and as we learn more news, we will be sure to share it.


*Posted by John Bkila, Mayor’s Media and Digital Communications Specialist

Receive new post notifications by email

1 thought on “Mayor’s Monday Mailbag – July 12, 2021 – Are there lessons from Glen Abbey for the proposed development of Millcroft Greens golf course?”

  1. If you’re so committed to the Millcroft area, why is the city recommending approval of the horrible variances request by Branthaven on Turnberry and Taywood? The entire neighborhood dislikes the plan but you’re not listening! The plan has virtually no green space with decks for backyards? Come on Mayor, we can do better!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Media Specialist: John Bkila