Newsletter Signup

Citizens present heritage recommendations

The recommendations will provide a service to heritage property owners, rather than a penalty for being on a municipal registry.
Burlington pumphouse

CDC Oct. 1, 6:30pm, City Hall, Council Chambers

Burlington pumphouseHeritage Burlington(HB)—the city’s citizen advisory committee on heritage matters—has completed their review of current heritage policies and made a comprehensive set of recommendations for council’s consideration. HB will present their report and recommendations to the city’s community development committee on Oct. 1. Members of the public are welcome to attend, and can register as a delegation to speak here.

The report, A New Approach to Conserving Burlington’s Heritage, was compiled after several months of extensive research and public consultation, including a community workshop and city-wide phone survey. The survey captured the opinions of 756 Burlington residents on heritage-related topics ranging from evaluating heritage properties and listing of heritage properties to funding and incentives for heritage conservation.

The report (available here) reflects what the committee heard from the community and will help move the city forward with a transparent, new vision for heritage conservation in Burlington.

Among the recommendations:

  • removal of all properties pre-classified as “B” under the Kalman system from the Municipal Register
  • Discontinue the current Heritage Clearance system, and develop a new service supported by the Planning and Building Department and Heritage Burlington entitled “Heritage Design and Advisory Services” that would be available to all heritage property owners.
  • approve a review of all heritage properties, by Heritage Burlington, with the cooperation of the Planning and Building Department between 2013 and 2016, starting with “A” and “D” properties.
  • approve a tax rebate program to assist owners of residential designated properties with the maintenance of their properties; the rebate would be a 20% reduction in the first year, increasing 5% per year to a maximum of 40% in 5 years. Investigate a similar program for commercial properties.
  • establish a Burlington Heritage Trust to fund renovation projects for both designated and non-designated properties on the Register.
  • approve allocation of $125,000 in 2013 for set-up costs for a Heritage Conservation Program, including communications, tax relief, grants & loans, heritage trust and staff support.

My Take: I’m supportive of the recommendations and believe they embody the critical principle that heritage preservation results in a community benefit, and thus requires a shared community responsibility. The recommendations will provide a service to heritage property owners, rather than a penalty for being on a municipal registry.

What's your take?

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.
Marianne Meed Ward

Marianne Meed Ward

I was inspired to seek public office because I believe, like so many of you, “I can do something about that” on the issues we face. As councilor, my role is to take a stand on what’s best for residents and go to bat for it. Pushback is inevitable from those who don’t have the community’s interests at heart. I will stand with you and for you, to achieve the best interests of our city, without caving to unacceptable compromise in the name of consensus.

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Constituent Assistant: Annemarie Cumber
905-335-7600, ext. 7689