Newsletter Signup

Burlington Council hears 2019 Budget feedback from delegations at Committee


It was great to hear from the seven delegates who attended the Committee of the Whole – Budget meeting Thursday (Feb. 7) morning to offer their feedback on the 2019 capital and operating budgets.

At Monday’s general Committee of the Whole meeting, we had Delegate James Sisson, who urged committee and council to maintain a city tax increase below 5 per cent.

The city is currently proposing a city tax increase of 3.99 per cent for the 2019 operating budget – I am looking to get this budget under 3 per cent for the city portion without compromising what I believe are city-essential services.

Earlier this month, city staff presented us with an overview of this year’s operating and capital budgets.

City staff has proposed a $1.67 million operating budget for 2019 with a city tax increase of 3.99 per cent (1.97 per cent to maintain services, 1.25 per cent for infrastructure renewal, and 0.77 per cent for service enhancements). When you combine the estimated regional and education tax rates for 2019, the increase for a Burlington homeowner will be 2.45 per cent — so, if you own a $500,000 home, you would be paying an additional $99.95 per year, or $1.92 per week.

Take a look at the 2019 operating budget book for a breakdown and more details here: Proposed-Operating-Budget-Book-web

The proposed 2019 capital budget, which also sets out a 10-year forecast, is $96.8 million with a 10-year proposed total of $819.3 million. Take a look at the 2019 capital budget book for a breakdown and more details here: Proposed-2019-Capital-Budget-and-2020-2028-Forecast-web

Remember, there is the Telephone Town Hall on Budget I am hosting tonight (Feb. 7), starting at 7:30. Residents can call in to 1-800-837-8058 to join in and have their say.

There’s also an in-person Budget Town Hall I am also hosting Monday, Feb. 11 at Burlington Central Arena from 2-3:30 p.m.

Be sure to also check the Upcoming Key 2019 Budget Dates.


1. Resident Gary Scobie – city tax increase/hydro reserve

  • Wanted the proposed city-tax increase of 3.99 per cent to stay below 3 per cent
  • Said he learned the hydro reserve is created from hydro dividends and interest that is payable to residents. He is in favour of funding the reduction of the city’s infrastructure budget and suggested council consider taking another $2 million per year from the hydro reserve to reduce the tax levy for Joseph Brant Hospital that “was supposed to disappear.”

2. Resident Jim Thurston – sidewalk access to Brant Hills Community Centre

  • Hoped council would fund the installation of sidewalk access to Brant Hills Community Centre, agreeing with the suggestion from Committee Chair and Ward 2 Councillor Lisa Kearns that the best location would be off of Brant Street.

3. Jim Young, Burlington Seniors Advisory Committee (BSAC) – sidewalk at BHCC and free transit fares for seniors

  • Echoed the importance of installing sidewalk access to Brant Hills Community Centre, as well as at other facilities local seniors use in an effort to encourage seniors to use facilities outside of dedicated seniors centres and lessen the strain on resources there.
  • Suggested the way to fill empty buses in the city was by providing free transit for seniors during off-peak hours (10 a.m.-2:30 p.m.), Monday and Friday, saying, “It would provide a dignified alternative to seniors who no longer drive and may suffer from social isolation, but it would also help improve the health and well-being of our seniors. The best way to get people out of cars and onto transit is by making transit the more popular option.”
  • Also said “Transit should be considered as a service and not a business operation.”
  • I asked Jim for his thoughts about free fare on Mondays, similar to Oakville, and he said BSAC believed free transit on off-peak hours, Monday-Friday, would be more useful for seniors, as opposed to encouraging ridership on one day a week.
  • Chair Kearns asked Jim of the three options in a similar cost-frame – free full-day transit on Mondays to sync with Oakville Transit, free during off-peak hours Monday-Friday, or more paratransit buses – which delivers the best value? To which, he again responded the off-peak free transit option.

4. Greg DeLazzari, board treasurer, Museums of Burlington – new Joseph Brant Museum

  • Spoke on the business case for the new 13,000-square-foot Joseph Brant Museum hopefully set to open in July 2019. The Board is asking for one-time funding of $58K and additional $150K relating to staffing, including a part-time janitor and part-time exhibitors and educators, as well as exhibit coordinators.
  • “We don’t want to be a failure and make the mistakes that have been done historically, previously,” he said.
  • I asked Greg if the exhibit coordinator/educator position could be paid out of revenue from exhibits and he said that would be the hope eventually, but there would be a growth curve as the museum opened.
  • Ward 6 Councillor Angelo Bentivegna asked if staff who worked at the previous Joseph Brant Museum building couldn’t be used to fill these positions and if there was any money from the funding of construction that could be used to pay these new staff? Greg responded the new building is fundamentally different from the previous two historical buildings (Joseph Brant and Ireland House museums).
  • “The new facility will house new exhibits, and offer more than the original Joseph Brant Museum did. To stay at the same staffing levels would be a mistake. We’re being pretty judicious asking for a couple of part-time staff. We need more people to run it and manage it.”
  • Ward 1 Councillor Kelvin Galbraith asked if there was a business plan for the revenue-generating exhibits? Museums Director Barbara Teatero said there are reports and research they have done and can provide these to committee. She also gave an example of a travelling exhibit in Kitchener, Ont. (similar to what the new museum would bring in) that brought forward about $90,000 in net revenue.
  • Ward 5 Councillor Paul Sharman asked if it was correct that the situation was one of Museums of Burlington having a brand new business model that was independent of the existing business model and now it was asking the city for more funding to assist the new model – Teatero and DeLazzari agreed.

5. Doug Brown, chair, Burlington for Accessible, Sustainable Transit (BFAST) – transit

  • Noted the new council seemed to have a positive outlook on transit and he was pleased to see in the proposed 2019 budget there was an increase to transit in the operating budget and progressive increases including the number of buses, supporting infrastructure, etc., over the next 10 years in the capital budget.
  • “When it comes to fixing transit, the problem has not been staff, it has been inadequate resources. So, we are currently seeing a turnaround. We have a long way to go, but we’re pleased to be on this journey. We’re pleased with budget improvements for transit and that they’re gradual. We’re viewing this in the long-term,” he said.
  • Noted BFAST was a little concerned about possible cuts to the proposed transit gains in order to get the city increase under 3 per cent – “Given that transit is so poorly funded, we hope the transit funding in the budget stays.”
  • Regarding free transit options, Doug said BFAST supported any measures that would get people on buses – “We would like to see council at some point have a fulsome discussion on the fare structure and look at issues of inaffordability, etc. The cash fare of $3.50 is pretty brutal.”
  • BFAST will once again be hosting their annual transit forum, looking at a May 4 date.
  • Here is a PDF of BFAST’s presentation to budget committee.

6/7. Residents Melissa Robillard and Kimberley Picken – Brant Hills splash pad

  • Noted there was a growing need for a splash pad in the Brant Hills community within walking distance as the number of young families in the area was increasing and the Mountainside splash pad wasn’t accommodating their demand – it has a barrier where the public has to line up to use, if it’s at capacity, which is frequent.
  • Suggested the optimal splash pad didn’t need to be huge, but could include shower and bucket models.
  • Robillard suggested washroom facilities on site would also be a good idea, but said she rather have a splash pad with no change rooms rather than no splash pad at all.


Receive new post notifications by email

3 thoughts on “Burlington Council hears 2019 Budget feedback from delegations at Committee”

  1. Am I correct in assuming that the Infrastructure Costs ( capital costs) will benefit present and future taxpayers. Should that be the case then why can’t these costs be amortized over a longer period and the funding for the same be accommodated by a City Bond Issue?

  2. Well said Penny. I’m with you on the, free and easy handouts of our tax dollars, to areas that should not be at the top of the priority list. There should be responsible people at both the BPA and the Museum that should have to come forward with concrete ideas to balance their books, not just submitting applications for more money!! There are many retirees and unemployed in Burlington receiving no wage increases, so the City’s handling of our money needs to be selectively fine tuned to keep our taxes as close to inflation as possible, or we as citizens will be sliding the slippery slope!

  3. I feel that if cuts are needed to be made to reach 2.99% to appease residents then the cuts in services need to be critically examined. Eliminating leaf cleanup or street sweeping is not in my opinion truly budget cuts. I am assuming that employee wages make up the major cost to provide these services. Will these employees be let go or simply moved to another city project? This is not really a cost saving measure.

    True tax reductions in my mind would be to ask the Burlington Performing Arts to do more than keep coming back each year for close to a million tax dollars. The venue cannot seem to pay for itself solely as a performing arts centre, then it needs to be creative in perhaps becoming a venue for weddings, conventions etc. There is a large open space with bar facilities, cloakroom etc. If the problem is that there is no proper kitchen ( which I thought was very interesting when I saw the venue when it opened) then put one in. This expense will open up options for the venue to be self funding.

    I have questions about the Joseph Brant Museum. Once again mega dollars were put into this museum and now they want the City to pay for staffing. These 2 venues in my opinion are legacy projects that benefit only a small percentage of the population. We need to spend our tax dollars to increase the quality of life for all residents. Infrastructure improvement may not be as glamorous as a performing art centre but it is needed and would benefit all residents

    Free transit for seniors is a nice to have option, but not the answer that will make seniors turn to public transit. More buses, better scheduling and routes is what will convince the public to use transit. Providing free bus service for seniors in my opinion is simply a bandaid that does not address the transit issue.

    I would rather see the appropriate tax increase now then have to continue to play catchup moving forward.

What's your take?

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Constituent Assistant: Georgie Gartside
905-335-7600, ext. 7689