Newsletter Signup

Tim Horton’s Rezoning Approved

After careful consideration, I voted in favour of the rezoning as a result of the modifications made by staff and Tim Horton's to address concerns raised by residents, including prohibiting a drive through and limiting hours of operation.
Blockbuster location on Brant | Tim Hortons

Tim Hortons - Brant Street BurlingtonOn Nov. 12, the city’s Development & Infrastructure Committee (formerly the Community Development Committee) approved the request to rezone 601 Brant Street to allow a coffee/bake shop (Tim Horton’s) at the former Blockbuster in the No Frills plaza. The rezoning also included a specific prohibition on any drive through. The recommendation received final approval at City Council on Mon. Nov. 26.

Residents raised concerns primarily about traffic congestion, pedestrian safety, hours of operation, rezoning to permit fast food, and the look of the building.

Additional concerns that were raised (about healthy food choices littering, saturation of coffee shops downtown), though valid, are outside the scope and jurisdiction of the city zoning regulations. Some can be addressed by other city bylaws.

In response to resident concerns that the location would become a late night hangout, Tim Horton’s has committed to a midnight closing time. The establishment is proposed as a new concept café and bake shop style restaurant with improved furniture and seating to encourage extended stays.

Tim Horton’s has proposed façade enhancements, including canopies, and have plans to reduce the corporate signage in size compared to the former video store sign to allow for better exposure of the Downtown Burlington gateway feature at Brant and Victoria. To avoid a blank wall facing the Brant St sidewalk, there will be a door onto Brant, as well as facing into the plaza.

Litter can be addressed through the city’s property standards bylaws, and Tim Horton’s will maintain their own corporate standards to keep their property litter-free. They have also expressed interest in participating in a regular community cleanup of the area.

Staff carefully reviewed the traffic reports prepared by the applicant, as well as conducting their own review. About 40% of traffic is anticipated to come from “pass by” drivers – people already on the roads passing by the site and stopping in.

The incremental increase in traffic amounts to about 60 additional cars in the morning peak hour – the busiest time. Analysis of the road capacity on Brant and surrounding streets indicates the roads can handle the increase. Volume currently sits at about 500 cars during the morning peak hours; capacity on the road network is about 800 cars per hour. Based on current transportation patterns in the downtown, 5% of customers are expected to arrive by transit, and 20% by cycling or walking.

Additional concerns were raised about pedestrian safety, especially for school children crossing Brant/Victoria to attend one of the three schools in the immediate area. Currently, the area is monitored by crossing guards during the morning, lunch and afternoon school hours. In addition, staff have recommended that additional safety measures be explored for the Victoria Street access during the site planning stage, with input from the School Crossing Guard Supervisor.

Staff will also be reviewing the site to ensure that pedestrians can safely navigate the property, again during the site plan stage which comes next in the planning process. In addition, Brant Street already has reduced speeds through this area because of the adjacent schools.

Regarding the history and intent of zoning on the site, the prohibition of fast food restaurants arose over 20 years ago, when the applicant proposed a drive through as part of a fast food use. Fast food uses are generally permitted in the downtown, and since this site will not include a drive through, staff concluded the fast food use without the drive through meets the historical intent for the site.

To read why staff supported the rezoning click here for the staff report; to read resident comments (over 130) click here.

My Take: After careful consideration, I voted in favour of the rezoning as a result of the modifications made by staff and Tim Horton’s to address concerns raised by residents, including prohibiting a drive through and limiting hours of operation. In addition, there was considerable community support for the project.

Your View:
To share your comments or questions on this project, please contact me or comment below.

Receive new post notifications by email

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.
Marianne Meed Ward

Marianne Meed Ward

I was inspired to seek public office because I believe, like so many of you, “I can do something about that” on the issues we face. As councilor, my role is to take a stand on what’s best for residents and go to bat for it. Pushback is inevitable from those who don’t have the community’s interests at heart. I will stand with you and for you, to achieve the best interests of our city, without caving to unacceptable compromise in the name of consensus.

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Media Specialist: John Bkila