in , ,

Committee votes 5-2 in favour of mayor’s motion for an 18 storey building across from City Hall; to council July 16

At the July 11 Planning & Development Committee, city councillors voted 5-2 in favour of a motion by the mayor to approve an 18-storey highrise across from City Hall at 409 Brant/James (17 storeys plus rooftop patio), plus Section 37 Community Benefits.

Committee also supported a motion I brought to direct city staff to work with Kelly’s Bake Shoppe, the Burlington Downtown Business Association and the Burlington Economic Development Corporation to relocate the bake shop in the downtown.

The approval heads to City Council Mon. July 16 at 6:30pm. Residents can submit comments on the recommendation to, or Register as a Delegation (by noon Monday) to speak at Council.

City planning staff had recommended modified approval of the original development proposal at Brant and James including:

  • reduction in height from 24 storeys, 227 units, to 18 storeys including a rooftop patio, reducing the height of the podium to 3 storeys (from 4), terracing the building away from Brant St. The current Official Plan permission is 4-8 storeys; the new adopted (not approved) Official Plan allows 11 to 17 storeys.
  • increase in proposed retail/commercial space. The developer had proposed reducing the commercial and retail space from 3600 m2 to 597 m2 retail only (no commercial). This represents an 85% decrease in existing commercial/retail space on site, thereby “eroding the retail and employment base of the downtown”, states the staff report. Staff recommend a minimum of 365 m2 of commercial or office space on the second floor and 760 m2 of commercial retail space at grade, for a total of 1,125 retail/commercial (still a reduction of about 70% from what currently exists).
  • increased parking, to 1.25 spaces per unit, versus the developer’s proposal of .93 spaces per unit.
  • increased amenity space to 18 m2 per unit  (bylaw requires 20 m2/unit; developer had proposed 3.6m2/unit).
  • 5m by 5m visibility triangle for the intersection of James Street and John Street.
  • 3m by 3m visibility triangle for the south-west and south-east corners of the property.
  • 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units are proposed
  • preservation and setback of two buildings with heritage value: Kelly’s Bake Shoppe and Albert Schmid Jewellers. Staff recommend the heritage facades be shifted back on the lot to for widened sidewalks and views into the Elgin Street Promenade.
  • three city trees need to be removed and will be compensated with replanting or cash-in-lieu, where replanting is not feasible, in the amount of $4,100.

Staff are recommending a Holding Zone until certain matters can be addressed including:

  • that the site is uncontaminated and suitable for the intended use;
  • development can be adequately serviced by storm sewers as a result of dewatering the underground parking garage.

Staff also recommend that additional wind mitigation measures should be incorporated at the site plan stage to enhance pedestrian comfort, and additional mitigation on shadow impacts on the public realm.

Staff are recommending approval of the modified project arguing it “meets the objectives of the current Official Plan, and the direction of the Council adopted Official Plan by allowing additional height … in exchange for a significant civic enhancement of the corner of Brant and James Street,  additional setbacks for building terracing and public realm improvements.”

Staff information report and supporting documents:

Section 37 Community Benefits

Staff have also proposed the following community benefits in exchange for the extra height and density on the site:

  • $250,000 for purchase of up to 6 assisted housing units by Halton Region, or similar contribution to housing fund held at the city
  • $100,000 for improvement of civic square
  • $50,000 for improvement of downtown transit terminal
  • $25,000 towards a downtown Burlington Farmer’s Market or other downtown festivals or events
  • $25,000 towards active transportation links (walking/cycling) in the Elgin Promenade area
  • widening sidewalks (Brant/James/John) – indirect benefit of $250,000
  • public easement at Brant/James of 16×16 – indirect benefit of $75,000
  • implement streetscape guidelines for expanded setbacks and open space easement for Brant/James/John – indirect benefit of $150,000
  • retain or relocate heritage attributes at 401 Brant Street (Kelly’s Bake Shoppe) and 444 John St. (Albert Schmid Jewellers) – indirect benefit of $300,000
Additional information on the original development submission: 409 Brant

My Take: I voted against the 18 storey approval (along with the Ward 4 councillor), as I believe this represents overdevelopment and forces out local businesses. I brought a motion to reduce the heights to 3 storeys along Brant St., up to 11 storeys along John St. consistent with most of the rest of downtown Brant Street,, but that was defeated 6-1. Though the changes from staff improve the proposal, it still represents overdevelopment with not enough benefit for the community to justify the impact of a massive build.

There is a major reduction in business space (retail/commercial) thus a reduction in overall employment downtown. The open space at the corner of Brant/James — offered as partial justification for the height — could have been gotten through daylight triangle and parkland dedication rather than accepting cash in lieu of parkland. The wind and shadow impacts are unacceptable (according to the staff report).

We don’t need this overdevelopment to meet our growth targets. As noted in the staff report, pg 21 ” The Downtown Urban Growth Centre is well positioned to meet its density targets by 2031″ and further “The Downtown Burlington Mobility Hub has exceeded the minimum density of 10,000 people and jobs associated with a Mobility Hub.”— and will reduce commercial/retail space on a prime downtown street.

Regarding the Section 37 Community Benefits negotiated for extra height and density, the assisted housing, heritage preservation and downtown festivals/events are items the community values and has requested over the years. The balance (transit terminal, civic square improvement, active transportation) can and should be funded out of regular operating expenses not through exchanges of height and density. We also have other tools for increased setbacks and public spaces (parkland dedication, daylight triangle) but one of the best ways is to change our zoning bylaw to eliminate development lot line to lot line and build in appropriate setbacks so we don’t need to negotiate for them later.

Written by Marianne Meed Ward

A Better Burlington began in 2006 after my neighbours said they felt left out of city decisions, learning about them only after they’d been made.

As journalist for 22 years, I thought “I can do something about that” and a website and newsletter were born. They’ve taken various forms and names over the years, but the intent remains: To let you know what’s happening at City Hall before decisions are made, so you can influence outcomes for A Better Burlington.

The best decisions are made when elected representatives tap the wisdom of our community members, and welcome many different perspectives.This site allows residents to comment and debate with each other; our Commenting Guidelines established in 2016 aim to keep debate respectful.

Got an idea or comment you want to share privately? Please, get in touch:


Leave a Reply
  1. It saddens me to attend meetings and observe the demeanour. What is going on currently with some elected councillors is unbelievable. I’m quite sure when they wanted the position(s), and knocked on doors to be elected, they did not indicate that they were going to mess up downtown. I’m also sure they didn’t mention that they would be giving away 4 million dollars (ours) to the boaters at LaSalle Park marina, so that they can continue to have free docking and a nice new break wall to keep their boats safe. All this while tax paying residents are confronted with a “private” sign when we wish to walk around. Yes, this is truly unbelievable… and they can, because we elect them to look after our interests.
    Be informed when you vote.

  2. Laughably, Jack Dennison voted against this skyscraper while previously voting in favour of the monstrosity next door??? While this seems inconsistent, I bet Jack looked around the chamber to make sure the motion passed before he voted against it! However, Jack’s recent pre-election newsletter (are these legal yet?), revealed Jack’s true colours–he wants to ruin Ward 4 while allowing development at the Burlington Mall and Eastway/Marilu’s Plaza. Truly shameful!!!!

  3. What will 1.25 parking spaces per unit accomplish? Where will residents park their second car if they have one? In a rented space in a municipal lot?

What's your take?





You did it! Clearview west side to be retained as low density

Skyway arena revitalization planned for 2020; open house for Lakeside Plaza redevelopment Aug. 8