Newsletter Signup

City of Burlington Looks to Challenge Ontario Land Tribunal Ruling on Lakeshore Inc. – 2069-2079 Lakeshore Rd.

2069-2079 Lakeshore and 383-385 Pearl rendering.


This is a devastating and shocking decision imposed on our community, which completely disregards the vision of residents, council and staff for this area. And so, Council will be examining all of our options for a review of this OLT decision.

This decision completely dismisses the considerable feedback from residents in opposition to this file – and their valuable suggestions for what would be appropriate. This decision ignored over 100 people who took the time to attend a community meeting, delegate to council, and write pages of letters. There was no acknowledgement of our community’s voice in this decision.

The decision highlights the inappropriate application of Provincial Planning Policies to justify overdevelopment and underscores the importance of a speedy decision from the Minister to remove the Major Transit Station Area designation from downtown and adjust the boundaries of the Urban Growth Centre to the Burlington GO Station, where this scale of development should be. We will continue to work to defend our plan and put growth where it belongs.

*Please see below a news release issued by the City of Burlington.

2069-2079 Lakeshore and 383-385 Pearl rendering.

Burlington, Ont. — Oct. 28, 2021 — Yesterday, the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) released its decision on Lakeshore Inc.’s proposal at 2069-2079 Lakeshore Rd. The City strongly disagrees with and is shocked by the ruling, which allows for a 29-storey building at that location.

This decision is not at all reflective of the planned context for the Downtown as expressed in the new Official Plan. It not only ignores the citizens of Burlington and Halton Region, and their Councils, it has ignored the stated intent of the Minister of Municipal Affairs to change the planning context by adjusting the Urban Growth Centre (UGC) boundary.

City Planning and Legal staff will review the decision in more detail to determine if a review of the decision by the Tribunal or a Court should be pursued, including their findings on the City’s motion regarding the impact of the Urban Growth Centre (UGC). At a special meeting of City Council on Nov. 3, staff will present these potential options and next steps in-camera.

Burlington’s revised new Official Plan (OP) was approved by Halton Region on Nov. 30, 2020. The new OP includes stronger protections for green space, heritage, jobs, the rural community, established low-density neighbourhoods and a special focus on preserving the character of the downtown. The modifications presented in the final Notice of Decision address the issues of non-conformity, changes to Provincial Plans and policies, and Official Plan Amendments and the need to balance Regional and Provincial conformity requirements. In addition, the modifications capture endorsed policy modifications related to two areas identified by Council for re-examination and refinement. The policies of the Official Plan with the recommended modifications establish a comprehensive policy framework to a planning horizon of 2031.

At the hearing, the City argued that Lakeshore Inc.’s proposal for 29-storeys was not appropriate for that location for a number of reasons, including the fact that the proposal far exceeded the height limits of 17-storeys allowed in that area, the City’s vision and planned context for the downtown as expressed in the new Official Plan, and the proposed building’s height and mass were not compatible with or provided appropriate transition to the surrounding area. In its decision, however, the OLT states that the development should be allowed as because provincial policy in the Growth Plan directs new residential growth to the Urban Growth Centre in a significant or ‘optimized’ manner.

The decision underscores the importance of the future boundary adjustment of the UGC to the Burlington GO station and the need for the new downtown policies in the new OP to be determined and brought into force.

The OLT stated “The Tribunal finds that there is no evidence of negative impact or any other justification for the modifications as advanced by the City to support a 22-storey tower instead of the 29-storey tower under the Lakeshore Proposal. Moreover, there is also no basis for the resultant substantial reduction in the number of residential units stemming from the City’s proposed modifications. The height reduction alone would eliminate between 63 and 77 residential units. Reducing the tower floorplate to 690 m2 as proposed … would eliminate a further 64 to 80 residential units.”

The City further argued that it is on track to meet or exceed provincial growth targets and regardless, the number of residential units should not result in a development that is incompatible with the existing area.

This decision is not indicative of the best planning outcome for Burlington residents or City of Burlington planning goals.

Links and Resources:

*Posted by John Bkila, Mayor’s Media and Digital Communications Specialist

Receive new post notifications by email

4 thoughts on “City of Burlington Looks to Challenge Ontario Land Tribunal Ruling on Lakeshore Inc. – 2069-2079 Lakeshore Rd.”

  1. Sharon Hutchinson

    The permission granted by OLT for the 29 storey to go forward leaves serious questions to be asked! Did the City falter on their process/presentation in holding to their terms on height, or,??? With the Urban Growth Centre having been established to be near the GO and for this to happen, is a “travesty” by the City! With happenings such as this being supposedly so shocking to the City, tells us that they either get their affairs in order to mastermind OLT to receive positive City directives, or pack their bags!!

    1. Hi Sharon, this is John Bkila, the Mayor’s Media and Digital Communications Specialist. The Province announced this summer that it would commit to making the UGC adjustment to the Burlington GO — the City and Council are still awaiting final sign-off, expected this month. Thank you for sharing your feedback.

  2. We do not want to become another Toronto!! That’s why we chose to live here.. imagine the lakeshore road traffic which is bad already during rush hours not to mention new street snd brant street etcetc.. Almost every residence in that building will have 1-2 cars also that will be using city streets.. and the lakefront in Burlington is beautiful .. can spencer smith park and the downtown stay beautiful if it is soooo crowded no one will want to attend special events etcetc.. traffic is already crazy busy along lakeshore downtown..and very difficult to find parking already.. It will get even worse.. Not fair either for homes around that area who will lose their sunlight and lake views.. It’s way tooo much!! We moved here and purchased our first home around 1980 before we married.. now we are close to retirement snd have never regretted our decision to raise our family here.. but honestly the lakefront needs to be protected so residents of burlington and my grandchildren snd their children can continue to love snd enjoy our special home..please don’t allow urban growth to destroy Burlington’s Legacy.. The best City to live in, in Canada..Let’s keep it that way

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Media Specialist: John Bkila