Newsletter Signup

Burlington Nearing End of Work Revising Downtown Plan, Requesting UGC/MTSA Adjustments

Burlington Development & Urban Growth Centre

Please Note: Below you will find a fuller version of my most recent guest column submitted to the Burlington Post that had to be edited down to fit the newspaper’s word count for print.

We’re heading into the final stages of updating our plan for downtown Burlington, as well as the entire city-wide Official Plan (OP).

Next steps:

  • Council unanimously approved asking Halton Region through their update to the Region’s Official Plan (now underway) to adjust the boundary of the Downtown Urban Growth Centre (UGC) to generally align with the lands in proximity to the Burlington GO Station and remove the Major Transit Station Area (MTSA) designation from the downtown. This is another milestone towards community-led control of development in our downtown and one more step to help us better manage growth in our city as a whole. It’s not the last or only step, but a significant one as we continue working towards growth in the right scale and the right places.
  • Final approval rests with the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH), who received an update during our meeting at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario.
  • Background studies and recommendations on updating the downtown plan were released in June. Council will consider modifications at our Sept. 30 committee meeting, for a final vote at Council Oct. 7. Residents can register to speak (virtually) at either meeting or submit feedback in writing via Overall, the revised adopted plan is not only much better than the 2018 adopted plan, but better than the existing OP. There are some areas I’m reviewing closely, for heritage and scale. I will be posting a complete analysis on in advance of the Sept. 30 meeting for public comment.

Residents have repeatedly said they want to maintain the “small town feel” and heritage of downtown Burlington and expressed concern about a slew of high-rises. I share these values and have advocated for them since we began the OP review during the last term of council.

There were 6 tall buildings that were approved by previous councils, 2 of them were approved before my time on council (but one of those I was involved with as a citizen); and 1 was approved by the then-known Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).

Of these 7 that I did not support (either as a private citizen or a councillor), 5 are currently under construction — those are the ones residents are currently seeing.

We can’t go back in time and reverse these approvals, but there’s still time to ensure current and future applications for our downtown fit into our collective vision for the area. That’s the goal of the revisions to the downtown plan we’re now discussing.

In terms of the buildings downtown referenced, they are:

  1. Brock I: 472 Brock development by Molinaro Group, 14 storeys. Approved during my first term on Council; I did not vote in favour. Built and occupied.
  2. Brock II: 490-492 Brock development by the Molinaro Group, 22 storeys. Approved during the term of the previous council before this current one. I did not vote in favour. Under construction.
  3. 421 Brant St., north east corner of Brant/James, across from City Hall, Gallery Condos and Lofts by Carriage Gate, 23 storeys. Approved during last term of council. I did not vote in favour. Under construction.
  4. 409 Brant St., south east corner of Brant/James, across from City Hall, 17 storeys. Approved during last term of council. I did not vote in favour. Currently appealed at the LPAT to get 23 storeys (same height as building across the street from it).
  5. The Berkeley at 395 Martha St., approved in 2009 before I was on council. As a private citizen, I was active appearing as a delegate to Council – I supported the 6-8 storey medical/parking garage on the block (which was never built), but did NOT support the 17-storey apartment that was ultimately approved and is now built.
  6. The Bridgewater at 2050 Lakeshore Rd. Approved by a previous council in the 1990s, but is being built now.
  7. The Nauitque by ADI Developments at 374 Martha St., 26 storeys. Opposed by all of Councill but later approved by the OMB. Currently, under construction.

These 7 buildings are vastly outnumbered by the appropriate projects in Ward 2 and across the City that I have supported as my time as a councillor and Mayor.

The good news is our downtown continues to attract a wide range of built form. Of recent approvals, six are less than 11 storeys (the City’s cut-off for a tall building) and are in low- to mid-rise form (4-8 storeys). There’s even one semi-detached unit; and a good mix of jobs, including at the hospital redevelopment (7 storeys). Mid-rise buildings are viable, and the projects underscore that it’s just as important to ensure jobs, not just residential, as blocks in the downtown redevelop over time.

Please continue to participate in the process — we’re almost at the end of signing off on a better plan for downtown, and the city.

– Burlington Mayor Marianne Meed Ward can be reached at

Receive new post notifications by email

5 thoughts on “Burlington Nearing End of Work Revising Downtown Plan, Requesting UGC/MTSA Adjustments”

    1. Hi Melanie, this is John Bkila, the Mayor’s Media and Digital Communications Specialist. Please email us at mayor@burlington with what particular information involving a proposed Tyandaga development you’re looking for, so that we can assist you better. Thank you.

  1. Great work!
    Assuming that the proposed OP is approved municipally & provincially, what is the likelihood that some/ all of the supposed 31 LPAT appeals will be withdrawn/ rejected, and downtown Burlington can get back to business. I suspect the uncertainty is contributing to the reduction in new retail investment and leaving many existing storefront locations vacant.

  2. Making the best out of a scandalous situation. No one was held accountable and no forensic process audit done. Its never too late.

  3. I’m looking and hoping that similar sentiments and decisions enter into determining what the updated city wide OP looks like in other Wards, for me particularly in Ward 1 Aldershot, at the end of the day. A similar anything goes pyramiding of more height and density from one proposal to the next, has appeared in this area, especially very near low density neighborhoods. A firm control hand is needed, and I support what the Mayor says here about how we move into the appropriate development forms of the future here and city-wide.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Here are guidelines before you comment, and our expectations before we will post:

  • Be civil. Would you speak this way to a good friend? If not, rewrite.
  • Focus on the issues. Build your argument and make your case in support of your opinion from facts, research or other sources. That way we can all learn. “I disagree with so-and-so because…” is fine; “So-and-so is naïve/stupid  for thinking the way he/she does and here’s why…” is not acceptable.
  • Don’t make personal attacks. Don’t assume motives of those you disagree with, make unfounded allegations, spread rumours, or engage in any other behaviours that would discourage you from participating if someone said this to, or about, you. The Golden Rule applies: Do unto others as you would have done to you. We will edit or not post comments with this type of content.
  • Say it once: When comments from the same individual or individuals become repetitive, going over ground already stated, we reserve the right to close commenting.
  • Use your full, and real, name. If wish to make a comment in public, we expect you will publicly stand behind it with your name. If you don’t want to publicly reveal your name, that’s fine; you are always welcome to share your thoughts with me privately via my email below. I welcome and consider all feedback in making decisions for the community.
  • Have fun, consider and learn. Share your views and read those of others. May we all benefit from a healthy exchange of ideas, and learn a little more about the people in our community, what you think, and what’s important to each of you. You may end up changing your mind about an issue; even if you don’t, we hope everyone will gain a greater understanding of why people have different perspectives.


A Better Burlington began in 2006 after my neighbours said they felt left out of city decisions, learning about them only after they’d been made. As journalist for 22 years, I thought “I can do something about that” and a website and newsletter were born. They’ve taken various forms and names over the years, but the intent remains: To let you know what’s happening at City Hall before decisions are made, so you can influence outcomes for A Better Burlington. The best decisions are made when elected representatives tap the wisdom of our community members, and welcome many different perspectives.This site allows residents to comment and debate with each other; our Commenting Guidelines established in 2016 aim to keep debate respectful. Got an idea or comment you want to share privately? Please, get in touch:

Newsletter Sign Up

Phone: 905-335-7607

Media Specialist: John Bkila